The law expert straightforward: the Xiaolong Indian LCA than joke

French military observers Mi Lier.: I just visited Pakistan, I found that they will soon be equipped FC-1 (JF-17) fighter very confident. But I have seen the opposite view India's military forums. Now I want to know the fact that in the end is what. Who can give me a little more information about it? In addition, I found a very interesting situation in Pakistan, is that they are very eager to China can be developed in the next 10 years can match stronger than the United States and the United States F22 fighter.

For these we think? Do not laugh!

The slow progress of Indian-made LCA light fighter

The military observers Mili Er. So:

Beautiful but naive question, but only the future can give you the answer. Specific technical data is not made public before we can not give a prediction, and we'll see how best to wait until after they have served. India only the developed LCA a fighter? On China's development of the F22's ridiculous. If you know the The U.S. developed F22 encounter much difficulty, you would not have proposed this view.

So far, JF17 is also gives impressed. But if it is the electronic systems of the West, its performance should be better. However, there is an important factor leading FJ17 lead LCA, it is a relatively small area of ​​radar reflection. The extensive application of the composite material because the surface of the LCA. If both use similar radar systems, the LCA will comparative advantages. The following comment on it to the experts.

LCA to small reflection area, thanks to its appearance. LCA will get a lot of advantages when LCA and JF17 head close. My friends involved in the LCA design (materials experts) told me that the LCA has minimal radar reflection signal. But we need to install it with active phased array radar (AESA) Ha ha ha!

, If you have the AESA that the LCA will turn into a deadly bird. But I do not think he will soon install AESA, because the LCA is now being developed. The MMR or 2032 radar can only be installed. I think that made the AESA radar may be installed on an improved version of the LCA. But we need to do now is to speed up the development work of the LCA.

Perhaps India should take action in other ways to slow JF17 development progress in service until the LCA. Yes, this is to prevent their methods. However, they still fantasize about in March this year to get the first batch of eight JF17, then 20 a year.

They may be to the the JF17 in Russia engine case. However, I doubt whether they can be 8 JF17. If India is determined to the MIG35 win new Indian fighter tender at the same time determined to participate in Russia's 5th generation (in fact, it is the fourth generation of the Western) fighter, and Russia will not allow the above.

DD said even if Russia allows the engine to Pakistan, JF17 is just than the LCA into the Air Force as early as two or three years. (Visible LCA "service needs" long

I saw that you mentioned. But I have also seen more interesting message: that China has developed a with RD93 similar engine WS13 fact that this engine has been Russia's help, for example, to provide technical, spare parts. Russia does not like it, because they do not want to compete in the market with cheap engine. But China has a tradition of "stealing" technology, he can not get. So Russia is actively deal with this situation. China said the WS13 developed nearing completion. That may be true. However, the development of high-performance aviation engine is very difficult. After mastering this engine process may also have problems, or they can not he eventually mastered the core technology. If China can not be done, they can RD93 installed JF17 on, and then say that this is WS13, Russia will really care about this? Even if Russia know that he will lie with China because of economic reasons. I refuse to knowledge based on economic reasons, India can do is complain about nothing. This is just the business!

My opinion, China and Russia will complete the deal, or Russia to provide engines to China but said it is produced in China (just heard that Russia is being sold to China for the money 150 engines) or simply with a Russian engine production JF17 then behind the secret deal, after all, China is an important trading partner of Russia.

J10, Gripen, LCA, is responsible for different tasks in the same generation fighter, however. JF17 different generations. I only LCA is concerned:

LCA has four redundant fly-control system. And 45% is applied to the composite. LCA is not completely delta wing aircraft, the double-delta wing to overcome the shortcomings of the pure delta wing. LCA has a full glass sitting position (to replace the traditional instrumentation displays

LCA data processor is even better than the Swedish Gripen fighter. The LCA uses solid-state sensors and control systems.

LCA and J10 just combat role, but is of the same generation fighter. J10 while the technical assistance of the Design Bureau of Russia's Siberia. LCA because the government's assessment and approval has been delayed.

In addition, J10 and LCA FADEC (full authority digital control type) engine. LCA KAVERI engine being developed (now American), and China in the development of the WS13 does not rely on Russia (seems the WS13 confuse became

LCA = "the Gripen CD fighters when everything depends on the performance of the radar with AESA (Active Phased Array Radar) LCA can shoot down SU30MKI, but we can say he stronger than MKI? I can not! The air war the outcome depends on the overall system performance of the aircraft.

But the LCA the internal device is a challenge. The LCA very suitable for the installation of imports Radar coordinated operations of the receiving system, intelligence collection systems and early warning aircraft. If it is not limited by the payload he may become a multi-role fighter.

As we all know The the the LCA radar reflective surfaces and France gust Typhoon, Europe, the Swedish Gripen compared to large or small? Although I know may be confidential, but I really want to know.

Certainly LCA reflection section is very low, thanks to his appearance as well as 45% of the amount of the composite. Moreover, the intake port of the LCA also carried the low detectability design. I would like to the reflection area should be less than Swedish Gripen, considering Dimensions.

45% of the data is based on the found weight of the material or by the surface area of ​​the total ratio? I heard that 90% of the area of ​​the use of a composite.

I said the data is based on the weight, in fact, all the LCA surface with a composite material.