The Chinese navy has made the U.S. military can not be in China's coastal swagger!

Chinese naval escort the fourth anniversary of the HD Mito: Zhang aesthetic boutique

REVIEW: Russian Military Industrial Complex News reported on February 26, February 25 thematic reviews of the powers of the Russian "Kommersant - Weekly pointed out, the history of world dominance by key waters must pass through the country to master control Commercial Road supremacy at sea in the 19th century, the United Kingdom, 20th century, won by the United States. ...

Russian Military Industrial Complex News reported on February 26, February 25 thematic reviews of the powers of the Russian "Kommersant - Weekly pointed out, the history of world dominance by the national master control necessary key area of Commercial Road 19th century the seas are British, 20th century, won by the United States. Now the marine control over battle still did not stop, and the main battlefield of the 21st century will commence in the Pacific. China will become a strong competitor in the United States, and the rapidly increasing the strength of the People's Liberation Army Navy anti-intervention system for at least the U.S. has lost the ability to swagger in China.

Russian media said, in September last year, the East China Sea conflict. Dozens of Taiwanese fishermen into the rich oil and gas resources in the waters of the Diaoyu Islands, September 25 clash with Japan for the first time, attack was Japanese patrol boats water cannons. Since last year Diaoyu Islands become the target of fierce competition the two warships often maneuver in this area. Taiwan on this issue firmly on the Chinese mainland side, often sent to the Diaoyu Islands fishing boats and warships escort. Diaoyu Islands incident escalating.

February 7, Japan's defense minister accused the Chinese the warships fire control radar targeting Japanese warships in an attempt to use the threat of force. Kashin, Russian Strategy and Technology Analysis Center experts believe that the move aimed at another person as a person armed. However, the Chinese government firmly rejected the Japanese side accused the official spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Hua Chunying stressed that spreading false information in an attempt to increase crisis situations, deliberately create a tense atmosphere, mislead international public opinion, discredit China's image.

In fact, China showed the muscle in the East China Sea, a show of force, just around the Pacific influence Enter the Dragon, the first signs. And the main rival of the growing strength of China is not Japan, but now the marine overlord of the United States. Began to escalate again four months since the Sino-Japanese dispute over the Diaoyu Islands, the world's observers were surprised to see the reaction of the United States this conflict is not even consistent.

According to the Japan-US Security Agreement, the United States seems obliged to immediately stand to one side of their regional allies, but the American official support in the form of statement only in January 19th Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's visit to Japan when Japan, then no similar statement results Japanese uneasy. Obama's domestic opponents even believe that the current situation is the first negative consequences of the U.S. strategic shift to Asia, seems to have led to the differentiation between the major powers in the Asia-Pacific region.

It should be noted that the US-Japan Trilateral purely military relationship in order to understand the change of the balance of power in the Asia-Pacific region, especially in recent years has undergone a significant change. The main problem is that the U.S. Navy's own ability to move freely in waters near China are rapidly losing.

The Navy University professor involved in the development of U.S. naval strategy Labelle acknowledged that the U.S. Navy is now faced with the major challenge is the emergence of a powerful anti-intervention system, but also has an outside territorial waters, Marine Enforcement powerful navy.

Russian media said that until the mid-1990s, the Chinese leaders are not particularly great importance to the development of the Navy, the turning point in the 1996 Taiwan Strait crisis. Before Taiwan leader election in the Taiwan Strait, China large-scale live-fire teaching firing exercise, a show of force to deter Taiwan independence elements. In response, the U.S. Navy sent warships to this region, ready to not hesitate to take all means to obstruct the determination of the continent of force to resolve the Taiwan issue.

Since then, Chinese leaders put forward the principle task to stop U.S. interference in the Taiwan issue is purely China's internal affairs. Efforts in this direction have been built effective and comprehensive anti-intervention system, developed in all aspects of deterrence enemy warships, forcing it to as far away as possible from the Chinese coastline advanced weaponry, including high-precision ballistic missile anti-ship cruise missiles, land-based aircraft helicopters, submarines, high-speed missile boats and powerful mines disorders.

Chinese naval escort the fourth anniversary of the HD Mito: Zhang aesthetic boutique

After the completion of the first task around the Taiwan region concentrate on building antiaccess system, China has begun to build a similar system along the entire coastline. Master intelligence according to U.S. experts, the mass deployment of ballistic missiles and anti-ship cruise missiles in the coastal built track fixed (air bases, ports, command posts, etc.) and mobile (surface ships, submarines, etc.) at sea strong reconnaissance of the target system, the integrated use of satellite, over-the-horizon radar, unmanned aerial vehicles and underwater sensor networks. In addition, China is also preparing to attack U.S. Navy command system, damage underwater fiber optic cable, and destroy the communications satellite, the implementation of a cyberspace attack.

China in the fight against the U.S. Navy might interfere with the fruits of China's coastal military conflict is very obvious, but temporarily still did not usher in the development of the Navy revolutionary, unable to break through the so-called "second island chain" to perform tasks far out at sea, or the effective protection of the Indian Ocean sea transportation lines vital for China's economy. China is clearly in the direction of positive efforts, but only increased in recent years, a number of multi-purpose submarines (five nuclear submarines and 48 diesel submarines).

Procured from Ukraine unfinished "Varyag" aircraft carrier on the basis of official service last year, China's only aircraft carrier refitted. According to the assessment of military experts, the carrier still needs a lot of years to the offshore areas outside of actual combat significance, because it temporarily neither have the necessary carrier-based aircraft, trained pilots nor crew have mastered Other operational capability.

Russian media said that China not formally proposed the building of ocean-going fleet of tasks. Chinese naval experts said, whether it is at present, or in the long-term prospects, the main task of the Chinese strategy is to ensure the security of China's coastal areas. The reason why the Chinese navy must break the "first island chain", but in order to establish the strategy of the Chinese coastal defense in depth. Chinese intelligence to predict their grasp, the U.S. Department of Defense, 2020, the Chinese navy may have at least 10 low-intensity combat warships far out at sea. At the same time, China's naval power and its anti-intervention system has been able to ensure that the Chinese navy to control coastal situation sure.

U.S. military experts were forced to admit that 20 years after the end of the Cold War, already accustomed to completely dominate the world's oceans, the U.S. Navy is not ready so effective development and growth of China's anti-intervention system. In particular, the United States uneasy, accustomed to the free movement of U.S. aircraft carrier battle space, as well as the so-called "high-value operational units, particularly its size, equipment level par large aircraft carriers and amphibious landing transport ship survival rates began to be challenge.

Not only are they forced more and more away from the waters of China continues to expand the anti-intervention, but even in the ocean can not guarantee its own security, especially in China, developed specifically for the anti-aircraft carrier "Dongfeng-21D" anti-ship ballistic missile. In addition, the U.S. military bases in Japan and South Korea, the most important Chinese missile targeting. This situation makes the U.S. very embarrassing to fulfill its own obligations to its allies and partners in the Asia-Pacific capacity is a problem with it in the future, especially after the emergence of conflict situations in China's coastal.

In addition, Pentagon experts believe that China has developed anti-intervention system weapons, in particular, the experience and technology of high-precision anti-ship missiles, it is very likely to be transferred to the regional powers, the first is quite powerful financial Iran and other countries. The former commander of the U.S. Navy Roughead once at a congressional hearing that his task is to try to make the maritime operations in the United States are not prohibited, to ensure that the U.S. Navy's ability to act without restriction.

U.S. military experts pointed out that the situation has been formed, the United States has the worst choice is to take a passive defense stance, just to guarantee the freedom of movement of the waters of the United States Navy to survive, and the Asia-Pacific forward deployment base. American Center of Strategic and International Studies in July 2012 in a special report on the request of the Pentagon, U.S. allies and partners, as well as China, should not suspect the victory of the United States in the event of post-conflict capacity.

The United States should show their readiness and ability to the war, even anti-intervention conditions, military operations in the Western Pacific in the U.S. Navy are other threats to the case. The report also stressed that, taking into account the rapid increase in China's military strength, the United States and China, the consequences of a direct military conflict is difficult to predict, and therefore should do everything possible to avoid this conflict. But the report said that if the United States fails to create opportunities for the suppression of China's anti-intervention system, it will not be able to present the complex relationship between China and neighboring countries gradually evolved into the possibility of more large-scale conflict to a minimum.

Russian media said, the U.S. Navy, both through military technical way, through the operational and tactical way to solve the above problem, but the implementation of the approach of the majority will be subject to the restrictions of the defense budget cuts. The U.S. response to China's anti-intervention system development in the operational and tactical levels, air and maritime war.

From the U.S. Navy 30-year shipbuilding plan appropriate adjustments every year, these arguments did not result in a significant adjustment of the U.S. Navy construction plans temporarily, but some changes have taken place. Recognized a decrease in the number of large amphibious ship construction such as the adjustment program in 2012, the delay of the funding period of the second ship, "Ford" class aircraft carrier, was increased from two years to four years.

But at the same time firm decisions replaced with a new multi-purpose Littoral Combat Ship frigates and minesweepers. The Littoral Combat Ship is the United States specifically for the suppression of possible opponents coastal developed anti-intervention system, plans to invest $ 14 billion over 15 years to build 55. It is thanks to the emergence of this relatively inexpensive multipurpose warship, the United States will it be possible to organize a stable production of their own needs, the price is acceptable, appropriate scale new warships.

Russian media said that the U.S. Navy's efforts to adapt in other aspects of the new situation of maritime military will encounter the same financial problems. U.S. Navy's the geographic deployment center of gravity began to adjust, tilt, part of the reason is that in order to suppress China's anti-intervention system from the Atlantic to the Pacific.

To this end, the United States also plans to more closely coordinate its navy with regional allies, first of all the actions of Japan and South Korea to solve this task. But U.S. experts, the general form is not accustomed to the situation in the United States, more important, the the obvious military strategy task impossible to get the support of the necessary resources. The reason for this situation, not only for financial reasons, as well as political reasons.

Return to the policies of the Asia-Pacific re-balanced development of mutual relations with the Asia-Pacific countries at the same time, the Obama administration is very willing to take initiatives that can cause a negative reaction, the Pentagon spokesman talking about the new operational and tactical vision of the Asia-Pacific region and even in formal occasions and plan when forced to do everything possible to avoid referring to China.

U.S. Navy University internal publications and even speculated that the Pentagon might use more moderate view, such as the idea of naval warfare, instead of Air Sea Battle, conceived so as to avoid the problems likely to be encountered by American political leaders in the development of relations with China. Therefore it can be concluded that the Pentagon own wrest the Chinese coastal control over the action plan in the future to gain political and financial support, and will continue to encounter significant challenges.