Mei Gaoguan intentional exposure of a message, Beijing counterattack means too hard

Chinese Navy

Organized by the semi-official think tank in the United States, "Wilson Center (the full name of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars)" seminar of the U.S. Strategic Dongjin Taiwan ". The experts believe that the "rebalancing" of U.S. Asia-Pacific strategy, Taiwan can play a role, but the Taiwan authorities must increase the defense budget in order to strengthen the military power, the United States is bound to "defend" not as in the past identified. U.S. Navy strategic experts point out that the rapid development of mainland China military power in case of the Taiwan Strait "something", the United States is able to send an aircraft carrier strike group to help defend Taiwan, there will be more to worry about.

Peak Military Observer, let it be known from U.S. think tanks and military strategists can be attributed to two points. First, the Taiwan defense 求人不如求己; mainland's military strength has been the ability to threaten the safety of the U.S. aircraft carrier fleet, in other words, the U.S. aircraft carrier is not like 1995 and 1996 in the Taiwan Strait as the drawing of the shock and awe of the PLA the. Naval War College Professor Holmes said, "At that time, U.S. President Bill Clinton sent 'Nimitz' and 'independent' in to the waters surrounding Taiwan is not afraid of being attacked.

But carefully pondering the above two points, you can find the real purpose of the U.S. think tank mouthpiece advocating. The first cross-strait exchanges identified as overheating, although there is no clear word, but in the U.S. Asia-Pacific strategy of "rebalancing" Taiwan can play a role in "hidden behind this statement should remind Taiwan still has to defend the United States up the mainstream of Taiwan relations. Second, do not cooperate with the mainland on the issue of the Diaoyu Islands and the South China Sea, in disguise interference take marine territorial disputes in China to promote the Asia-Pacific strategy of rebalancing.

Obama is helpless

No one says no U.S. aircraft carrier dare then to the Taiwan Strait the frontier to exercise military deterrence function. A mainland China has no ability and the courage to fight against the U.S. aircraft carrier battle group, the second is the self-confidence of the United States on its own military strength and Navy aircraft carrier. Anti-anti-ship missiles against U.S. military in to do two things, a continuing advocacy of the ability of the PLA's ballistic missile attacks on aircraft carriers, and the second thing is advocating anti-strike capability of the U.S. aircraft carrier, and come up with the United States 82,000 tons battleship test come vowed corroboration.

Therefore, in such a contradictory argument tangle, he did not dare to send another aircraft carrier to the Taiwan Strait to help defend in fact, under the guise of reason Bale.

Military Observer that the official U.S. think tank mouthpiece throw is not guaranteed to help Taiwan defend itself argument above remind Taiwan in cross-strait relations can not go too far beyond the intent. Mainly want to by rendering mainland military deterrence, to Taiwan up and down causing fear.

And according to the U.S. military's strategic need to strengthen the arms purchase, and continue to be a part of the island chain strategy in the United States to contain China, a more reliable and more resistant than the U.S. aircraft carrier combat unsinkable aircraft carrier. I believe that the United States is now thrown threat argument, "not necessarily to help Taiwan defend itself" do primers and pave the way for the next step targeted to sell arms to Taiwan, and to deploy new anti-missile radar system in Taiwan.

Helpless Obama

U.S. strategic maturity is very high. Grasp on its own Asia-Pacific strategy implementation and the situation in the Taiwan Strait is inter-related, each step are complementary. If Taiwan after caught, and in accordance with the program of the United States military procurement by the U.S. think tank confuse intimidation and military experts in military data chain in conjunction with the U.S. military under the premise of reintroduction like Japan, ABM-band radar, joined the United States in Asia-Pacific anti-missile system.

Then the move is bound to lead to the re tense cross-strait relations, and even into the result of a retreat. This avoids the above analysis of cross-strait relations overheating to the interests of the United States due to injury and strategic worries. The situation in East Asia to return to the old road to the United States, Japan Desk paramilitary alliance to contain China.

Now the argument has been thrown, whether in accordance with the author's ideas As for the next steps of the United States should continue to observe understood. Here to remind the U.S. arms sales to Taiwan and malicious provoke cross-strait relations must have been a common opposition of the Chinese on both sides, Sino-US relations will cause further damage, should the Chinese take any countermeasures consequences to bear by the United States. Also reminded the people of the island to the United States have no illusions, resisting reunification by force simply no way out, to cherish the years of joint efforts of the compatriots on both sides of the fruits of peace.

Taiwan with the United States in accordance with the command of the United States both strategic and military procurement of weapons and equipment before you really want something. And when mainland China was forced to get involved, the United States still cannot help defend, any Taiwan no use crying abuses. Fratricidal war are the sons and daughters of the Chinese nation, the United States already earned pours arms bonus.